From idea to submission: coordinating a winning Horizon Europe RIA project proposal
Agata Horwacik es consultora de proyectos europeos en Euro-Funding, con experiencia internacional en la gestión y coordinación de iniciativas vinculadas a la energía, la sostenibilidad y la transición energética. Anteriormente trabajó en la Fundación Hidrógeno Aragón como coordinadora de medio ambiente y sostenibilidad y como técnica especialista, participando en proyectos europeos como H2GLOBAL. También ha desarrollado experiencia en investigación e innovación a través de su etapa en el European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) y en Symkom. Su sólida formación académica incluye un doble máster en Energy Transition por InnoEnergy y la Politechnika Śląska, además de un máster en Energy Engineering and Management por el Instituto Superior Técnico de Lisboa, complementando su grado en Ingeniería Energética por la Politechnika Śląska y la Universidad de Zaragoza. Este recorrido le permite combinar una base técnica de excelencia con competencias en gestión internacional de proyectos, aportando un perfil altamente especializado en energías renovables, eficiencia energética y transición hacia un modelo sostenible.
Developing a competitive European funding proposal goes beyond simply writing a document. It’s a process that demands strategic coordination, clear planning, and ongoing communication between all partners in a consortium. For a Research and Innovation Action (RIA) under Horizon Europe Cluster calls, this means gathering a group of partners around a specific topic and transforming an idea into a fully developed, winning proposal.
Many projects with strong technical ideas struggle, not because the ideas are weak, but because they fail to manage the collaboration effectively. A successful submission is not a last-minute sprint. It requires aligning the team strategically from the start.
This process is divided into three key stages: building the strategic foundation, executing the core development, and handling the validation and submission. Understanding these stages is crucial for turning an initial concept into a project that has a real chance of securing funding.
Building the strategic foundation
The work done before the main writing begins is often the most reliable indicator of success. This early phase is focused on defining the project’s purpose, identifying key participants, and making sure all actions are aligned moving forward.
It starts with aligning the concept with the call. A successful proposal requires not just a strong idea, but the right idea for the specific call. Early on, the project concept should be clearly defined, the call text carefully reviewed, making sure it aligns with the EU’s priorities. To verify that the project meets these criteria, it is essential to assess its alignment with the expected outcomes outlined in the work programme. The project should also contribute to broader EU priorities and initiatives, such as the European Green Deal, digital sovereignty, the EU’s Digital Decade strategy, and other key policies aimed at fostering sustainability, innovation, and technological advancement. Without this strategic alignment, proposals are unlikely to be considered for funding, regardless of their technical strength.
For an RIA project, the concept must clearly demonstrate how the proposed research or innovation will address the specific needs outlined in the call. This includes aligning the project’s objectives with the expected outcomes of Horizon Europe and ensuring that the research will contribute to societal challenges in areas such as health, climate change, digital transformation, or green technologies.
A key step is to thoroughly analyze how the proposed concept matches the topic description. This involves critically evaluating whether the project directly addresses the objectives of the call and aligns with the broader goals of the EU’s research and innovation agendas. It’s also important to assess whether the consortium has the necessary expertise and capabilities to deliver the expected outcomes. If any gaps or misalignments are identified, the project concept, partnership, or focus may need to be refined.
Once the concept is clear, the consortium must be consolidated. A common mistake is building a consortium of convenience. A stronger approach is to build a consortium of purpose, that is one that brings together complementary expertise, a clear European dimension, and balanced roles among the partners. This phase sets the stage for collaboration by clearly defining responsibilities, establishing communication channels, and creating a shared vision of the project’s impact.
In practice, this often involves starting with a small core group of trusted partners, agreeing on the fundamental project narrative, and only then inviting additional organizations that bring complementary strengths. These could include industrial partners, technology providers, SMEs, public authorities, universities, civil society organizations and advisory board experts, depending on the project’s focus.
Once the partnership is formed, the next step is to manage both the administrative and strategic aspects of the proposal preparation. The lead applicant, often working with a central coordinator, must prepare the necessary templates, register all participants, and collect the legal and financial information required for Part A of the application. This detailed work should begin early to prevent complications as the deadline approaches.
At the same time, the strategic narrative needs to be developed. This involves shaping the high-level objectives, designing the work package structure, and defining the expected results and impact. This framework ensures that all partners are aligned and work towards the same goals when drafting their respective sections.
At this stage, it is very useful to prepare a short, informal concept note of two to three pages that includes the working title, the problem the project addresses, the main objectives, a first sketch of work packages, and a draft list of partners. Sharing this note with the consortium helps align expectations and provides something concrete to react to during the first proposal meetings.
Harmonising content, costs and communication
This is probably the most intensive phase, where the strategic plan is transformed into a coherent, persuasive and data backed document. The main challenge here is bringing together contributions from different partners and ensuring they work seamlessly as a unified proposal.
Proposal development involves writing and aligning the various sections contributed by a diverse consortium. A typical consortium may include ten or more partners, each with different priorities, writing styles, and native languages. Without strong central coordination, the proposal can quickly become fragmented, with sections lacking consistency in tone and possibly containing contradictions. Evaluators can identify this lack of cohesion right away, which reflects poor management and increases the overall risk of the project.
The coordinator’s role is to oversee the entire process, ensuring smooth integration and editing of all contributions. This includes managing a clear timeline with strict internal deadlines set well ahead of the official submission date. Sticking to these deadlines is crucial for maintaining quality. It allows time for review, integration, and refinement, reducing last-minute pressure and improving the final outcome. Regular coordination meetings and effective document-sharing practices are essential for keeping everything on track.
For an RIA project, many coordinators work with a simple internal calendar. For example, finalizing the excellence section four weeks before the deadline, completing the impact section two weeks before, and avoiding any major changes to the work plan in the last ten days. While this approach may seem strict, it helps prevent last-minute changes that could create inconsistencies and disrupt the overall coherence of the proposal.
This coordination ensures that every section, from the technical excellence and socio-economic impact chapters to the implementation plan, tells a consistent story. The innovation described in the excellence section must directly lead to the results discussed in the impact section, and those results must then be realistically delivered by the plan outlined in the implementation section.
For an RIA project, it is essential to highlight the research or innovation’s novelty and its expected contribution to advancing knowledge or solving pressing societal challenges. This is particularly important in demonstrating how the project fits within Horizon Europe’s focus areas.
One effective way of checking consistency is to review the alignment of the key elements across the proposal’s main sections. It is important to verify that the main issues are consistent throughout, that the same key results are referenced in each section, and that the role of each work package is clearly integrated into the overall narrative. If any of these points are inconsistent or unclear, they need to be adjusted to make sure everything fits together properly.
At the same time, the budget must be built, which very often is one of the most complex parts of the proposal preparation. A realistic budget should reflect the project narrative in financial terms. Therefore, partners will need help translating their technical contributions into costed work packages. It’s crucial to align the activities described in the proposal with the necessary resources, such as person-months, while also following the specific funding rules. A budget that doesn’t match the technical details, such as a partner with a large role but a minimal budget, will raise concerns for evaluators.
In RIA projects, it’s helpful to start budget discussions based on effort rather than cost. Each partner can estimate the number of person-months per work package, and these estimates should be checked against the roles and responsibilities outlined in the proposal. Once this alignment is confirmed, the detailed budget can be worked out, ensuring that the costs are consistent with the usual daily rates and match the indicative budget stated in the call.
It’s important to have a focused discussion with all partners about the budget, separate from the technical aspects. Whether through a meeting or other communication channels, the focus should be on the allocation of resources, roles, and person-months. This approach helps define responsibilities and make sure everyone is aligned on the financial structure.
Validation, submission and beyond
The final step involves carefully reviewing the proposal to ensure that months of work are not affected by small errors.
Before submitting the proposal, it’s important to do a thorough validation check. This goes beyond simple proofreading and includes reviewing all sections—technical, administrative, and financial—to make sure everything is consistent and accurate. The budget totals in Part A and Part B should match, partner details need to be correct, page limits must be followed, and annexes should be properly formatted. This ensures that the proposal is complete and meets all the necessary requirements.
A good practice is to have someone who hasn’t been directly involved in the writing process review the final version. Their fresh perspective can often identify inconsistencies, unclear sections, missing links between different parts, or assumptions that may have been obvious to the core team but not to an external reader.
Once the proposal is ready, it should be submitted through the Funding and Tenders Portal. Given that the portal can slow down or face technical issues closer to the deadline, it is highly recommended to do the proposal submission at least 24 hours in advance to avoid any last-minute problems.
In practice, it is helpful to aim for a version that is ready for submission two days before the deadline. The extra time can then be used to upload all documents, run the automatic checks in the portal, download the generated PDF and perform one last quick scan for any “cosmetic” issues related with formatting or missing elements and any potential inconsistencies that haven´t been spotted earlier.
The process doesn’t end with submission. The consortium may need to respond to clarification requests from evaluators during the assessment phase. If the proposal is successful, it moves on to the Grant Agreement Preparation phase. Managing this final administrative step with the same care and attention as the proposal ensures a smooth project start.
For coordinators new to Horizon Europe, it’s important to keep in mind that the skills gained during proposal preparation, such as structuring information, aligning partners and keeping an overview of many details, are exactly the same skills that will support coordinators during Grant Agreement Preparation and later during project implementation.
A coordinated approach to success
Developing a successful proposal requires strong teamwork, but effective coordination is the key factor that drives success. A clear timeline, solid collaboration, and central management are essential to ensure that the project is submitted on time, meets all requirements, and is strategically positioned for maximum impact.
For teams preparing a Horizon Europe RIA, a good starting point is to set aside time for an initial discussion with two or three key potential partners. Before this meeting, prepare a concise two-page concept note to review together. This note will help assess whether the project idea aligns with the call’s objectives and whether the consortium composition is appropriate. From there, the three phases of proposal development become much easier to manage.
Starting early and establishing a well-organized coordination process can make the difference between a promising idea and a funded, successful project.
LATEST NEWS
Coordinating EU collaborative projects
Coordinating EU collaborative projects: when execution marks the difference Lucía Duque Teva( Project Manager European Funds )Settings Coordinating a European collaborative project goes far beyond convening meetings or collecting deliverables….
EU Added Value in LIFE Proposals
EU Added Value in LIFE Proposals Fernando Gómez( Technical Manager – European Funds )Fernando Gómez es Technical Manager – EU Projects en Euro-Funding desde 2020, con experiencia coordinando propuestas europeas…
The vision of the EAIC on the future European budget
The vision of the EAIC on the future European budget Marie Latour( European Affairs Director )Actualmente, como Director de Asuntos Europeos en Euro-Funding, cuento con más de 14 años de…